Turing Project Lazarus: Data Buyer Profile, Revenue Share Terms, Payouts and Reputation

Turing, legal name Turing Enterprises, Inc., is a US AI data and RL-environment company whose Project Lazarus licenses operating records and code from active, winding-down and closed companies, non-exclusively and on a revenue share with nothing paid upfront. Turing takes a license to sell a company's record to AI labs and to build training tasks, evaluations and RL environments on it, while ownership stays with the company.

Turing states that it pays each time a record sells, publishes no percentage, is the only seller for the first 90 days after signing and offers up to USD 50,000 for referring a company, all checked 2026-11-09. Every term on this page is Turing's own claim, set out as one entry in an independent reference on AI training data licensing that covers buyers and sellers alike.

Turing's own surfaces disagree on price: its newsletter of 2026-03-25 quotes USD 1,000 per pull request and up to USD 10,000 per modern codebase, while the Project Lazarus page offers only a revenue share. No lawsuit, breach notice or regulator action naming Turing appears in the sources checked.

DataPacts is not a broker, takes no cut of any sale, has joined no referral program yet, and lists Turing like every other buyer, regardless of its referral reward.

Each figure below carries its source and check date, and how DataPacts sources and dates every figure is set out in the methodology.

What Turing Licenses Through Project Lazarus

Turing licenses a company's operating record: its chat, tickets, wikis and documents, source code and reviews, CRM and support history, databases, design files and legacy file shares. The systems Turing names on lazarus.turing.com, checked 2026-11-09, are listed below by category.

• Team chat: Slack and Teams
• Tickets: Jira and Linear
• Wikis and documents: Confluence, Notion and Drive
• Source code and code reviews: GitHub and GitLab
• CRM: Salesforce and HubSpot
• Support: Zendesk and Intercom
• Databases: Postgres and Snowflake
• Design files: Figma
• Legacy stacks: Lotus Notes, Novell and file shares

On a re-read of 2026-11-10, Turing's intake offers Slack as a selectable system under "How your team communicated". Turing's FAQ, re-read the same day, states that English records sell best. A company with years of tickets and code is therefore one answer to who buys AI training data from operating and closed companies, alongside frontier labs and data vendors.

What Turing does with a licensed record is twofold. It sells the record to AI labs under a non-exclusive license, and it builds its own training tasks, evaluations and RL environments on it; Turing pays the company in both cases. The program page names no AI lab that receives the records.

Turing Company Identity

Turing Enterprises, Inc. is the legal entity named in the footer of the Project Lazarus site. The table lists each attribute with its source, as of 2026-11-10.

No registry number or state of incorporation appears in the sources checked, so neither is stated. The round sits with others under funding and valuations of AI data companies.

Project Lazarus Revenue Share Terms, Dated

Turing publishes its Project Lazarus model but not its numbers: it pays a revenue share each time a record sells, with nothing upfront, and states no percentage (checked 2026-11-09). The table lists every term Turing states; each value is Turing's claim.

The page leaves out the numbers that decide income: the revenue share percentage, when money arrives after a sale, the agreement text and the renewal terms after 90 days. Turing's figures sit beside micro1's, Mercor's and Handshake AI's in the program terms compared table, which dates each offer.

How a Project Lazarus Deal Works: Intake, NDA, Samples and QA Review

Turing describes six steps: a short intake, an online mutual NDA, rough volumes per system, samples shared through a private folder, a QA review within 5 business days, and one revenue share agreement. The steps, as Turing states them on lazarus.turing.com (checked 2026-11-09), are listed below.

1. Intake: a questionnaire that Turing says takes about two minutes.
2. Mutual NDA: signed online before any record is shared.
3. Volumes: rough counts per system, such as tickets, repositories or documents.
4. Samples: shared through a private folder.
5. QA review: Turing reviews the samples within 5 business days.
6. Agreement: one revenue share agreement covers the record.

Some work stays with the seller. Turing covers the cost of cleanup and packaging, but the rights audit, the decision to sign and the treatment of employee and customer personal data remain the company's responsibility, and Turing does not publish its detailed rules for such personal data. Turing pays for it, but de-identification before licensing data still needs the seller's own review.

Turing Payouts: Revenue Share, Code Prices and the Calculator Comparison

Turing states that Project Lazarus pays a company every time its record sells and whenever Turing builds training tasks, evaluations or RL environments on it, with nothing upfront and no published split. Without a percentage or payment timing, a seller cannot forecast income from the page, and how a revenue share compares with upfront and milestone payment shapes that risk.

Turing's page also shows a calculator comparison: four unnamed calculators value one made-up company at between USD 197,000 and USD 800,000, checked 2026-11-09. Turing does not present these ranges as its offer. The table sets Turing's own price statements side by side, as of 2026-11-09.

Turing's pages do not say whether the newsletter prices still apply under Project Lazarus, so DataPacts shows both and picks neither.

The newsletter prices date from 2026-03-25 and the revenue share from the program page checked 2026-11-09, so the two models stand as separate claims. A seller asks which model the agreement uses before sharing code. Under the newsletter list, organizational artifacts such as tickets and specs earn a price only when bundled with a codebase, so a company holding documents but no code gains nothing from it. Other buyers' rates for licensing source code and codebases, including per-token figures, are compared on the code page.

What Turing's 90-Day Selling Window Means for a Seller

For the first 90 days after signing, Turing states it is the only party selling a company's record; after that the company can renew or opt out. The licenses Turing grants to labs are non-exclusive, and ownership of the record does not change hands (checked 2026-11-09).

In practice, other buyers wait at least 90 days for the same record, while the same record can reach more than one lab through Turing. The page does not say what happens to a lab license granted inside the window once the company opts out, so that is a question for the contract. Turing also states no renewal terms beyond "renew or opt out", such as whether a renewal runs for another 90 days or changes the split.

The window differs from exclusive-by-default terms. Labelbox Prism states that its arrangements are exclusive by default and pay an upfront fee at signing plus a revenue share, checked 2026-11-09. A 90-day sole-seller period limits lock-in more than a standing exclusive license does, and the wider trade-offs of exclusive vs non-exclusive data licenses cover price, lock-in and carve-outs.

Project Lazarus for Winding-Down and Wound-Down Companies

Turing states that Project Lazarus accepts active, winding-down and wound-down companies, and its intake distinguishes companies shut down 90 days ago or less from those shut down more than 90 days ago (checked 2026-11-09). The company statuses the intake offers are listed below.

• Active
• Winding down
• "Shut down ≤90 days ago"
• "Shut down >90 days ago"

Turing's FAQ states demand is strongest in the US, the UK, Canada and the EU, re-read 2026-11-10. For a closed company, the 90-day sole-seller window starts at signing, not at closure, and someone with authority over the company's assets must sign. Because Turing states it covers de-identification, cleanup and packaging, a company without remaining staff does not have to fund that work itself, although the rights questions stay with whoever signs. Who that is, from a former director to a liquidator, is covered under selling data from a shut-down company.

Turing Reputation: Lawsuits, Incidents and Complaints

No lawsuit, data breach notice or regulatory action naming Turing Enterprises, Inc. appears in the court and regulator sources checked as of 2026-11-09. The table records that result.

An empty record is a finding about the sources checked, not a guarantee, and it says nothing about how Turing performs under an agreement. It covers court dockets, state breach-notice registers and regulator announcements in the sources reviewed for this page.

Turing's contributor work, such as assessments and pay, is a separate matter from the licensing of company records and is not assessed here. The training-data case tracker lists no case against Turing.

Is Turing Legitimate as a Buyer of Company Data?

Turing is an identifiable company: Turing Enterprises, Inc. operates the Project Lazarus site under its own name and publishes its program model, process and referral terms openly. Its own announcement of 2025-06-10 describes a Series E round and names Khazanah Nasional and WestBridge Capital among its investors, without naming a lead, and its company page names its co-founders.

What stays open is the part a seller signs. The revenue share percentage, the agreement text and the payment timing after a sale are not published, no registry number appears in the sources checked, and the program page names no lab that receives the records.

A seller can check four points before sharing samples: the counterparty is Turing Enterprises, Inc., outreach comes from a turing.com address, the NDA is mutual, and the agreement states the split and payment timing. These checks follow the general guide to whether a data licensing email legitimate in appearance really is, including one claiming to come from Turing.

Benefits, Risks, Downsides and Alternatives to Licensing Data to Turing

Licensing to Turing costs nothing upfront and keeps ownership with the company, but income depends on sales Turing does not forecast, and the split and agreement are not public. The four lists below separate benefits, risks, downsides and alternatives, with Turing's claims checked 2026-11-09.

Benefits (as Turing states them):

• No upfront cost, with de-identification, cleanup and packaging paid by Turing.
• Payment on every sale and whenever Turing builds tasks, evaluations or RL environments on the record.
• Ownership stays with the company, and lab licenses are non-exclusive.
• A sole-seller period of 90 days, after which the company can renew or opt out.

Risks:

• The revenue share percentage is not published.
• The agreement text and payment timing after a sale are not public.
• Turing's detailed rules for employee and customer personal data are not published.
• Other buyers must wait out the 90-day window.

Downsides:

• No guaranteed income: a record that never sells earns nothing.
• Two price models on Turing's own surfaces, with no statement of which applies.
• The effect of opting out on lab licenses already granted is not stated.

Alternatives:

• Other company data programs, such as micro1, Mercor and Handshake AI, some of which state upfront amounts.
• Labelbox Prism, which states an upfront fee plus a revenue share under exclusive-by-default terms.
• Licensing elsewhere after the 90-day window ends.
• Not licensing at all, which keeps every record and every option inside the company.

Whichever option a company weighs, the agreement decides the outcome. The guide to the AI data licensing agreement sets out each clause to read before signing, from field of use to deletion.

Turing Among Company Data Partnership Programs

Turing is one of several companies that license operating records from companies alongside their expert-contributor work. It sits with the other company data partnership programs, among them micro1, which publishes tiered company payouts, Mercor, which states payment by wire on delivery, typically within 2 to 4 weeks of signing, and Handshake AI, which runs a comparable data partnership program. Labelbox Prism, exclusive by default, offers the sharpest contrast on terms. Side-by-side pages set out micro1 vs Turing Project Lazarus, Turing vs Mercor on payment model and Turing vs Scale AI. Companies comparing options can review Turing alternatives for licensing company records and the wider alternatives to selling data, including keeping it.

More About Turing

Turing Jobs and Contributor Work

Turing's remote jobs, assessments, trainer roles and contributor pay concern its expert network, not the licensing of company records. Its contributor roles are compared under AI training jobs and platforms. Expert contributor work is one way labs buy human data.

Other Companies Called Turing and Other Project Lazarus Results

This page covers only Turing Enterprises, Inc. and its data program; camera software, a car-maker chip and research fellowships sharing the Turing name, and games called Project Lazarus, are unrelated. None of them licenses company records for AI training.

Frequently Asked Questions About Turing Project Lazarus

Does Turing pay upfront for company data?

No: Turing states "Nothing upfront" and pays a revenue share each time the record sells, checked 2026-11-09. It also pays when it builds training tasks, evaluations or RL environments on the record, but publishes no percentage.

What does Turing do?

Turing is an AI data and RL-environment company that supplies AI labs with datasets, RL environments and expert contributors. Through Project Lazarus it also licenses records from active, winding-down and closed companies, as Turing states.

Turing builds RL environments, training tasks and evaluations on licensed records for labs, and pays the company when it does.

Who is the CEO of Turing?

Turing's company page names Jonathan Siddharth as CEO and co-founder, with co-founder Vijay Krishnan. Turing states it was founded in 2018, and the legal entity behind Project Lazarus is Turing Enterprises, Inc.

Does Turing pay referral fees?

Turing states "Refer a company, earn up to $50K", paid only if the referred company signs and its record sells, checked 2026-11-09. The structure is not published, so a referrer cannot calculate the amount in advance.

The offer can be compared with other referral programs of AI data buyers, which state different triggers and maximums.

Can Turing sell my records to more than one AI lab?

Yes: Turing states its licenses are non-exclusive, so the same record can go to more than one lab. For the first 90 days after signing, Turing is the only party selling the record, after which the company can renew or opt out (checked 2026-11-09).